TY - JOUR
T1 - Rapid pulmonary vein isolation utilizing the third-generation laserballoon – The PhoeniX registry
AU - Heeger, Christian H.
AU - Tiemeyer, Christian M.
AU - Phan, Huong Lan
AU - Meyer-Saraei, Roza
AU - Fink, Thomas
AU - Sciacca, Vanessa
AU - Liosis, Spyridon
AU - Brüggemann, Ben
AU - Große, Niels
AU - Fahimi, Bezhad
AU - Reincke, Samuel
AU - Kuck, Karl Heinz
AU - Ouyang, Feifan
AU - Vogler, Julia
AU - Eitel, Charlotte
AU - Tilz, Roland R.
N1 - Funding Information:
CHH received travel grants and research grants by Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Claret Medical, SentreHeart, Biosense Webster and Cardiofocus and Speaker’s Honoraria from Biosense Webster, Cardiofocus and Boston Scientific. RRT received travel grants from St. Jude Medical, Topera, Biosense Webster, Daiichi Sankyo, SentreHeart and Speaker’s Bureau Honoraria from Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Pfizer, Topera, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Bayer, Sano Aventis and research grants by Cardiofocus. CE received travel grants and educational grants by Medtronic. All other authors have no relevant disclosures. KHK received travel grants and research grants from Biosense Webster, Stereotaxis, Prorhythm, Medtronic, Edwards, Cryocath, and is a consultant to St. Jude Medical, Biosense Webster, Prorhythm, and Stereotaxis. He received speaker's honoraria from Medtronic.
Funding Information:
CHH received travel grants and research grants by Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Claret Medical, SentreHeart, Biosense Webster and Cardiofocus and Speaker’s Honoraria from Biosense Webster, Cardiofocus and Boston Scientific. RRT received travel grants from St. Jude Medical, Topera, Biosense Webster, Daiichi Sankyo, SentreHeart and Speaker’s Bureau Honoraria from Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Pfizer, Topera, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Bayer, Sano Aventis and research grants by Cardiofocus. CE received travel grants and educational grants by Medtronic. All other authors have no relevant disclosures. KHK received travel grants and research grants from Biosense Webster, Stereotaxis, Prorhythm, Medtronic, Edwards, Cryocath, and is a consultant to St. Jude Medical, Biosense Webster, Prorhythm, and Stereotaxis. He received speaker's honoraria from Medtronic.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Background: Balloon-based ablation systems for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are providing procedural safety and efficacy as well as favourable clinical outcome. Although second-generation laser balloon (LB2) based PVI has been shown safety and efficacy relatively long procedural duration was a strong limitation. The third-generation laser balloon (LB3) offers and automized ablation for rapid PVI. We determined safety, efficacy and procedural characteristics of this new promising ablation system. Methods and results: A total of 15 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent PVI using the LB3. A total 59/59 PVs (100%) were successfully isolated. Procedural data was compared to the last 15 consecutive patients treated by the LB2. The median procedure time significantly declined from LB2 (91 (86, 105) min) to LB3 (77 (68, 87) min), p < 0.001. Similarly, the median left atrial dwelling time significantly decreased from LB2 (72 (62, 84) min) to LB3 (45 (38, 52) min), p < 0.0001. The total laser time decreased from LB2 (1920 (1765, 2193) sec) to LB3 (1077 (896, 1165) sec), p < 0.00001. A pure single shot PVI was performed in 18/59 PVs (31%). For major adverse events no differences were detected between the groups (LB2 1/15 (6.7%) and LB3 1/15 (6.7%), p = 0.999). Conclusion: The LB3 was safe and effective for PVI. Procedure time, LA dwelling time and total laser time significantly decreased compared to LB2.
AB - Background: Balloon-based ablation systems for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are providing procedural safety and efficacy as well as favourable clinical outcome. Although second-generation laser balloon (LB2) based PVI has been shown safety and efficacy relatively long procedural duration was a strong limitation. The third-generation laser balloon (LB3) offers and automized ablation for rapid PVI. We determined safety, efficacy and procedural characteristics of this new promising ablation system. Methods and results: A total of 15 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent PVI using the LB3. A total 59/59 PVs (100%) were successfully isolated. Procedural data was compared to the last 15 consecutive patients treated by the LB2. The median procedure time significantly declined from LB2 (91 (86, 105) min) to LB3 (77 (68, 87) min), p < 0.001. Similarly, the median left atrial dwelling time significantly decreased from LB2 (72 (62, 84) min) to LB3 (45 (38, 52) min), p < 0.0001. The total laser time decreased from LB2 (1920 (1765, 2193) sec) to LB3 (1077 (896, 1165) sec), p < 0.00001. A pure single shot PVI was performed in 18/59 PVs (31%). For major adverse events no differences were detected between the groups (LB2 1/15 (6.7%) and LB3 1/15 (6.7%), p = 0.999). Conclusion: The LB3 was safe and effective for PVI. Procedure time, LA dwelling time and total laser time significantly decreased compared to LB2.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087300489&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100576
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100576
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85087300489
SN - 2352-9067
VL - 29
JO - IJC Heart and Vasculature
JF - IJC Heart and Vasculature
M1 - 100576
ER -