Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization

Lukas Müller, Felix Hahn, Aline Mähringer-Kunz, Fabian Stoehr, Simon Johannes Gairing, Friedrich Foerster, Arndt Weinmann, Peter Robert Galle, Jens Mittler, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Michael Bernhard Pitton, Christoph Düber, Uli Fehrenbach, Timo Alexander Auer, Bernhard Gebauer, Roman Kloeckner*

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: Clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) was previously identified as a prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, little is known about the prognostic influence of CEPH on the long-term outcome of patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), particularly in Western populations. Objectives: This study investigated the prevalence and prognostic influence of CEPH in a Western population of patients with HCC undergoing TACE. Methods: This retrospective study included 349 treatment-naïve patients that received initial TACE treatment at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and November 2020. CEPH was defined as a combination of ascites, esophageal/gastric varices, splenomegaly and a low platelet count. We assessed the influence of CEPH and its defining factors on median overall survival (OS) in HCC patients. We compared the effects of CEPH to those of well-known prognostic factors. Results: Of the 349 patients included, 304 (87.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis. CEPH was present in 241 (69.1%) patients. The median OS times were 10.6 months for patients with CEPH and 17.1 months for patients without CEPH (log rank p = 0.036). Median OS without a present surrogate was 17.1 months, while patients with one respectively more than two present CEPH surrogates had a median OS of 10.8 and 9.4 months (log rank p = 0.053). In multivariate analysis, CEPH was no significant risk factor for OS (p = 0.190). Of the CEPH-defining factors, only ascites reached significance in a univariate analysis. Conclusion: CEPH was present in more than two thirds of the patients with HCC undergoing TACE in our cohort of Western patients. Patients with CEPH had a significantly impaired survival in univariate analysis. However, no significance was reached in multivariate analysis. Thus, when TACE treatment is deemed oncologically reasonable, patients should not be excluded from TACE treatment due to the presence of surrogates of portal hypertension alone.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftUnited European Gastroenterology Journal
Jahrgang10
Ausgabenummer1
Seiten (von - bis)41-53
Seitenumfang13
ISSN2050-6406
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 02.2022

Fördermittel

Lukas Müller, Fabian Stoehr and Simon Johannes Gairing are supported by the Clinician Scientist Fellowship “Else Kröner Research College: 2018_Kolleg.05”. This research received no external funding.

TrägerTrägernummer
Bayer HealthCare Frankreich

    UN SDGs

    Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

    1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
      SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    2. SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur
      SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur

    Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

    • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Biomedizintechnik
    • Profilbereich: Lübeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

    DFG-Fachsystematik

    • 2.22-30 Radiologie
    • 2.22-14 Hämatologie, Onkologie

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Prevalence and clinical significance of clinically evident portal hypertension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Zitieren