Abstract
Background. To reduce the risk of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in continuous spinal anaesthesia, small-gauge spinal catheter systems with different techniques of dural perforation have been developed. Methods. Two systems, the catheter through-needle technique (MicroCatheter, Portex, UK) and the catheter over-needle technique (22G Spinocath®, B. Braun, Germany), were used in 18 young healthy volunteers (age 18-30 yr), who were enrolled in a neuroendocrinological investigation for analysis of neuropeptides in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). After intermittent sampling of CSF (17×0.5 ml over 4 h), the catheter was removed and the development of PDPH and pain intensity were documented prospectively by the subjects in a standardized headache assessment (11-point numerical rating scale [NRS]). Results. The study revealed a high overall incidence of PDPH (78%) with no significant differences between groups (P=0.26). However, the over-needle group showed a significantly shorter duration of PDPH (2.4 [SD 2.3] vs 5.1 [3.1] days, P=0.050) and lower maximum pain intensity (3.1 [2.9] vs 7.3 [3.4] NRS, P=0.014) than the through-needle group. Conclusions. The results demonstrate a potential benefit of the catheter over-needle technique for the reduction of the duration and intensity of PDPH.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Jahrgang | 94 |
| Ausgabenummer | 5 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 657-661 |
| Seitenumfang | 5 |
| ISSN | 0007-0912 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 05.2005 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Post-dural puncture headache in young adults: Comparison of two small-gauge spinal catheters with different needle design“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver