TY - JOUR
T1 - Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia
AU - Kupsch, Andreas
AU - Benecke, Reiner
AU - Müller, Jörg
AU - Trottenberg, Thomas
AU - Schneider, Gerd Helge
AU - Poewe, Werner
AU - Eisner, Wilhelm
AU - Wolters, Alexander
AU - Müller, Jan Uwe
AU - Deuschl, Günther
AU - Pinsker, Marcus O.
AU - Skogseid, Inger Marie
AU - Roeste, Geir Ketil
AU - Vollmer-Haase, Juliane
AU - Brentrup, Angela
AU - Krause, Martin
AU - Tronnier, Volker
AU - Schnitzler, Alfons
AU - Voges, Jürgen
AU - Nikkhah, Guido
AU - Vesper, Jan
AU - Naumann, Markus
AU - Volkmann, Jens
PY - 2006/11/9
Y1 - 2006/11/9
N2 - BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus has been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms of primary dystonia. We compared this surgical treatment with sham stimulation in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Forty patients with primary segmental or generalized dystonia received an implanted device for deep-brain stimulation and were randomly assigned to receive either neurostimulation or sham stimulation for 3 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline to 3 months in the severity of symptoms, according to the movement subscore on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (range, 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). Two investigators who were unaware of treatment status assessed the severity of dystonia by reviewing videotaped sessions. Subsequently, all patients received open-label neurostimulation; blinded assessment was repeated after 6 months of active treatment. RESULTS: Three months after randomization, the change from baseline in the mean (±SD) movement score was significantly greater in the neurostimulation group (-15.8±14.1 points) than in the sham-stimulation group (-1.4±3.8 points, P<0.001). During the open-label extension period, this improvement was sustained among patients originally assigned to the neurostimulation group, and patients in the sham-stimulation group had a similar benefit when they switched to active treatment. The combined analysis of the entire cohort after 6 months of neurostimulation revealed substantial improvement in all movement symptoms (except speech and swallowing), the level of disability, and quality of life, as compared with baseline scores. A total of 22 adverse events occurred in 19 patients, including 4 infections at the stimulator site and 1 lead dislodgment. The most frequent adverse event was dysarthria. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral pallidal neurostimulation for 3 months was more effective than sham stimulation in patients with primary generalized or segmental dystonia. (ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT00142259.)
AB - BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the internal globus pallidus has been shown to be effective in reducing symptoms of primary dystonia. We compared this surgical treatment with sham stimulation in a randomized, controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Forty patients with primary segmental or generalized dystonia received an implanted device for deep-brain stimulation and were randomly assigned to receive either neurostimulation or sham stimulation for 3 months. The primary end point was the change from baseline to 3 months in the severity of symptoms, according to the movement subscore on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (range, 0 to 120, with higher scores indicating greater impairment). Two investigators who were unaware of treatment status assessed the severity of dystonia by reviewing videotaped sessions. Subsequently, all patients received open-label neurostimulation; blinded assessment was repeated after 6 months of active treatment. RESULTS: Three months after randomization, the change from baseline in the mean (±SD) movement score was significantly greater in the neurostimulation group (-15.8±14.1 points) than in the sham-stimulation group (-1.4±3.8 points, P<0.001). During the open-label extension period, this improvement was sustained among patients originally assigned to the neurostimulation group, and patients in the sham-stimulation group had a similar benefit when they switched to active treatment. The combined analysis of the entire cohort after 6 months of neurostimulation revealed substantial improvement in all movement symptoms (except speech and swallowing), the level of disability, and quality of life, as compared with baseline scores. A total of 22 adverse events occurred in 19 patients, including 4 infections at the stimulator site and 1 lead dislodgment. The most frequent adverse event was dysarthria. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral pallidal neurostimulation for 3 months was more effective than sham stimulation in patients with primary generalized or segmental dystonia. (ClinicalTrials. gov number, NCT00142259.)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750706519&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa063618
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa063618
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 17093249
AN - SCOPUS:33750706519
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 355
SP - 1978
EP - 1990
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 19
ER -