Pain inhibition is not affected by exercise-induced pain

Tibor M. Szikszay, Waclaw M. Adamczyk, Ewa Wojtyna, Kerstin Luedtke*

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit
1 Zitat (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction:Offset analgesia (OA) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are frequently used paradigms to assess the descending pain modulation system. Recently, it was shown that both paradigms are reduced in chronic pain, but the influence of acute pain has not yet been adequately examined.Objectives:The aim of this study is to investigate OA and CPM after exercise-induced pain to evaluate whether these tests can be influenced by delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) at a local or remote body site.Methods:Forty-two healthy adults were invited to 3 separate examination days: A baseline appointment, the consecutive day, and 7 days later. Participants were randomly divided into a rest (n = 21) and an exercise group (n = 21). The latter performed a single intensive exercise for the lower back. Before, immediately after, and on the following examination days, OA and CPM were measured at the forearm and the lower back by blinded assessor.Results:The exercise provoked a moderate pain perception and a mild delayed-onset muscle soreness on the following day. Repeated-measurements analysis of variance showed no statistically significant main effect for either OA or CPM at the forearm or lower back (P > 0.05).Conclusion:Delayed-onset muscle soreness was shown to have no effect on the inhibitory pain modulation system neither locally (at the painful body part), nor remotely. Thus, OA and CPM are robust test paradigms that probably require more intense, different, or prolonged pain to be modulated.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummere817
ZeitschriftPain Reports
Jahrgang5
Ausgabenummer2
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2020

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Pain inhibition is not affected by exercise-induced pain“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren