TY - JOUR
T1 - Pain inhibition is not affected by exercise-induced pain
AU - Szikszay, Tibor M.
AU - Adamczyk, Waclaw M.
AU - Wojtyna, Ewa
AU - Luedtke, Kerstin
N1 - Funding Information:
W.M. Adamczyk is supported by the ETIUDA scholarship provided by National Science Center in Poland (2017/24/T/HS6/00329). E. Wojtyna is supported by the SONATA scholarship provided by National Science Center in Poland (2016/23/D/HS6/02810).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Introduction:Offset analgesia (OA) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are frequently used paradigms to assess the descending pain modulation system. Recently, it was shown that both paradigms are reduced in chronic pain, but the influence of acute pain has not yet been adequately examined.Objectives:The aim of this study is to investigate OA and CPM after exercise-induced pain to evaluate whether these tests can be influenced by delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) at a local or remote body site.Methods:Forty-two healthy adults were invited to 3 separate examination days: A baseline appointment, the consecutive day, and 7 days later. Participants were randomly divided into a rest (n = 21) and an exercise group (n = 21). The latter performed a single intensive exercise for the lower back. Before, immediately after, and on the following examination days, OA and CPM were measured at the forearm and the lower back by blinded assessor.Results:The exercise provoked a moderate pain perception and a mild delayed-onset muscle soreness on the following day. Repeated-measurements analysis of variance showed no statistically significant main effect for either OA or CPM at the forearm or lower back (P > 0.05).Conclusion:Delayed-onset muscle soreness was shown to have no effect on the inhibitory pain modulation system neither locally (at the painful body part), nor remotely. Thus, OA and CPM are robust test paradigms that probably require more intense, different, or prolonged pain to be modulated.
AB - Introduction:Offset analgesia (OA) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) are frequently used paradigms to assess the descending pain modulation system. Recently, it was shown that both paradigms are reduced in chronic pain, but the influence of acute pain has not yet been adequately examined.Objectives:The aim of this study is to investigate OA and CPM after exercise-induced pain to evaluate whether these tests can be influenced by delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) at a local or remote body site.Methods:Forty-two healthy adults were invited to 3 separate examination days: A baseline appointment, the consecutive day, and 7 days later. Participants were randomly divided into a rest (n = 21) and an exercise group (n = 21). The latter performed a single intensive exercise for the lower back. Before, immediately after, and on the following examination days, OA and CPM were measured at the forearm and the lower back by blinded assessor.Results:The exercise provoked a moderate pain perception and a mild delayed-onset muscle soreness on the following day. Repeated-measurements analysis of variance showed no statistically significant main effect for either OA or CPM at the forearm or lower back (P > 0.05).Conclusion:Delayed-onset muscle soreness was shown to have no effect on the inhibitory pain modulation system neither locally (at the painful body part), nor remotely. Thus, OA and CPM are robust test paradigms that probably require more intense, different, or prolonged pain to be modulated.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095135323&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000817
DO - 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000817
M3 - Journal articles
AN - SCOPUS:85095135323
SN - 2471-2531
VL - 5
JO - Pain Reports
JF - Pain Reports
IS - 2
M1 - e817
ER -