Abstract
In this article, I will argue in favor of both the ethical and epistemological utility of explanations in artificial intelligence (AI)-based medical technology. I will build on the notion of “explicability” due to Floridi, which considers both the intelligibility and accountability of AI systems to be important for truly delivering AI-powered services that strengthen autonomy, beneficence, and fairness. I maintain that explicable algorithms do, in fact, strengthen these ethical principles in medicine, e.g., in terms of direct patient–physician contact, as well as on a longer-term epistemological level by facilitating scientific progress that is informed through practice. With this article, I will therefore attempt to counter arguments against demands for explicable AI in medicine that are based on a notion of “whatever heals is right.” I will elucidate my elaboration on the positive aspects of explicable AI in medicine as well as by pointing out risks of non-explicable AI.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Aufsatznummer | 50 |
| Zeitschrift | Philosophy and Technology |
| Jahrgang | 35 |
| Ausgabenummer | 2 |
| ISSN | 2210-5433 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 06.2022 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
-
SDG 4 – Qualitativ hochwertige Bildung
-
SDG 5 – Gender Equality
-
SDG 8 – Angemessene Arbeitsbedingungen und wirtschaftliches Wachstum
-
SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur
-
SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten
-
SDG 11 – Nachhaltige Städte und Gemeinschaften
-
SDG 12 – Verantwortungsvoller Konsum und Produktion
-
SDG 16 – Frieden, Gerechtigkeit und verlässliche Institutionen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „On the Ethical and Epistemological Utility of Explicable AI in Medicine“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver