TY - JOUR
T1 - Localized Ewing tumor of bone: Final results of the Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study CESS 86
AU - Paulussen, M.
AU - Ahrens, S.
AU - Dunst, J.
AU - Winkelmann, W.
AU - Exner, G. U.
AU - Kotz, R.
AU - Amann, G.
AU - Dockhorn-Dworniczak, B.
AU - Harms, D.
AU - Müller-Weihrich, S.
AU - Welte, K.
AU - Kornhuber, B.
AU - Janka-Schaub, G.
AU - Göbel, U.
AU - Treuner, J.
AU - Voûte, P. A.
AU - Zoubek, A.
AU - Gadner, H.
AU - Jürgens, H.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2001/3/15
Y1 - 2001/3/15
N2 - Purpose: Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study (CESS) 86 aimed at improving event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk localized Ewing tumor of bone. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 301 patients recruited from January 1986 to July 1991 (60% male; median age 15 years). Tumors of volume >100 mL and/or at central-axis sites qualified patients for "high risk" (HR, n = 241), and small extremity lesions for "standard risk" (SR, n = 52). Standard-risk patients received 12 courses of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin alternating with actinomycin D (VACA); HR patients received ifosfamide instead of cyclophosphamide (VAIA). Tumor sites were pelvis (27%), other central axis (28%), femur (19%), or other extremity (26%). The initial tumor volume was <100 mL in 33% of cases and ≥100 mL in 67%. Local therapy was surgery (23%), surgery plus radiotherapy (49%), or radiotherapy alone (28%). Event-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses, comparisons were done by log-rank test, and risk factors were analyzed by Cox models. Results: On May 1, 1999 (median time under study, 133 months), the 10-year EFS was 0.52. Event-free survival did not differ between SR-VACA (0.52) and HR-VAIA (0.51, P = .92). Tumor volume of >200 mL (EFS, 0.36 v 0.63 for smaller tumors; P = .0001) and poor histologic response (EFS, 0.38 v 0.64 for good responders; P = .0007) had negative impacts on EFS. In multivariate analyses, small tumor volumes of <200 mL, good histologic response, and VAIA chemotherapy augured for fair outcome. Six of 301 patients (2%) died under treatment, and four patients (1.3%) developed second malignancies. Conclusion: Fifty-two percent of CESS 86 patients survived after risk-adapted therapy. High-risk patients seem to have benefited from intensified treatment that incorporated ifosfamide.
AB - Purpose: Cooperative Ewing's Sarcoma Study (CESS) 86 aimed at improving event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk localized Ewing tumor of bone. Patients and Methods: We analyzed 301 patients recruited from January 1986 to July 1991 (60% male; median age 15 years). Tumors of volume >100 mL and/or at central-axis sites qualified patients for "high risk" (HR, n = 241), and small extremity lesions for "standard risk" (SR, n = 52). Standard-risk patients received 12 courses of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin alternating with actinomycin D (VACA); HR patients received ifosfamide instead of cyclophosphamide (VAIA). Tumor sites were pelvis (27%), other central axis (28%), femur (19%), or other extremity (26%). The initial tumor volume was <100 mL in 33% of cases and ≥100 mL in 67%. Local therapy was surgery (23%), surgery plus radiotherapy (49%), or radiotherapy alone (28%). Event-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses, comparisons were done by log-rank test, and risk factors were analyzed by Cox models. Results: On May 1, 1999 (median time under study, 133 months), the 10-year EFS was 0.52. Event-free survival did not differ between SR-VACA (0.52) and HR-VAIA (0.51, P = .92). Tumor volume of >200 mL (EFS, 0.36 v 0.63 for smaller tumors; P = .0001) and poor histologic response (EFS, 0.38 v 0.64 for good responders; P = .0007) had negative impacts on EFS. In multivariate analyses, small tumor volumes of <200 mL, good histologic response, and VAIA chemotherapy augured for fair outcome. Six of 301 patients (2%) died under treatment, and four patients (1.3%) developed second malignancies. Conclusion: Fifty-two percent of CESS 86 patients survived after risk-adapted therapy. High-risk patients seem to have benefited from intensified treatment that incorporated ifosfamide.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035868651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1818
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1818
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 11251014
AN - SCOPUS:0035868651
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 19
SP - 1818
EP - 1829
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -