Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Kinetics of the Antibody Response to Boostering With Three Different Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2

Robert Markewitz*, David Juhl, Daniela Pauli, Siegfried Görg, Ralf Junker, Jan Rupp, Sarah Engel, Katja Steinhagen, Victor Herbst, Dorinja Zapf, Christina Krüger, Christian Brockmann, Frank Leypoldt, Justina Dargvainiene, Benjamin Schomburg, Shahpour Sharifzadeh, Lukas Salek Nejad, Klaus Peter Wandinger, Malte Ziemann

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: Heterologous vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and a second dose of an mRNA-based vaccine have been shown to be more immunogenic than homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. In the current study, we examined the kinetics of the antibody response to the second dose of three different vaccination regimens (homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vs. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 + BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) against SARS-CoV-2 in a longitudinal manner; whether there are differences in latency or amplitude of the early response and which markers are most suitable to detect these responses. Methods: We performed assays for anti-S1 IgG and IgA, anti-NCP IgG and a surrogate neutralization assay on serum samples collected from 57 participants on the day of the second vaccination as well as the following seven days. Results: All examined vaccination regimens induced detectable antibody responses within the examined time frame. Both heterologous regimens induced responses earlier and with a higher amplitude than homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Between the heterologous regimens, amplitudes were somewhat higher for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 + mRNA-1273. There was no difference in latency between the IgG and IgA responses. Increases in the surrogate neutralization assay were the first changes to be detectable for all regimens and the only significant change seen for homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Discussion: Both examined heterologous vaccination regimens are superior in immunogenicity, including the latency of the response, to homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. While the IgA response has a shorter latency than the IgG response after the first dose, no such difference was found after the second dose, implying that both responses are driven by separate plasma cell populations. Early and steep increases in surrogate neutralization levels suggest that this might be a more sensitive marker for antibody responses after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 than absolute levels of anti-S1 IgG.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer811020
ZeitschriftFrontiers in Immunology
Jahrgang13
Seiten (von - bis)811020
ISSN1664-3224
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 08.02.2022

Fördermittel

The authors want to express their gratitude towards all colleagues and coworkers who have made this study possible, special thanks go out to: Mrs. Ingrid Ascha, Mrs. Franziska Peters, Mrs. Dorothea Bachmann, Mrs. Sarah Schultz, Mrs. Silke Lipke-Reinke, Mrs. Astrid Messall, Mrs. Kathrin Johannsen, Mrs. Michaela Seidel, Mrs. Alexandra Jurat, Mrs. Grazyna Wardzinski, and Mrs. Jana Eicke-Metzenthin and the staff from the blood donation center, without whom this project would not have been possible.

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Infektion und Entzündung - Zentrum für Infektions- und Entzündungsforschung Lübeck (ZIEL)

Coronavirus-Bezug

  • Forschung zu SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Kinetics of the Antibody Response to Boostering With Three Different Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren