Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial

Holger Thiele*, Uwe Zeymer, Nathalie Thelemann, Franz Josef Neumann, Jörg Hausleiter, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Roza Meyer-Saraei, Georg Fuernau, Ingo Eitel, Rainer Hambrecht, Michael Böhm, Karl Werdan, Stephan B. Felix, Marcus Hennersdorf, Steffen Schneider, Taoufik Ouarrak, Steffen Desch, Suzanne De Waha-Thiele

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: The role of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in cardiogenic shock is still a subject of intense debate despite the neutral results of the IABP-SHOCK II trial (Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II) with subsequent downgrading in international guidelines. So far, randomized data on the impact of IABP on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction are lacking. Furthermore, only limited evidence is available on general long-term outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock treated by contemporary practice. Methods: The IABP-SHOCK II trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Between 2009 and 2012, 600 patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction undergoing early revascularization were randomized to IABP versus control. Results: Long-term follow-up was performed 6.2 years (interquartile range 5.6-6.7) after initial randomization. Follow-up was completed for 591 of 600 patients (98.5%). Mortality was not different between the IABP and the control group (66.3% versus 67.0%; relative risk, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.88-1.11; P=0.98). There were also no differences in recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, or rehospitalization for cardiac reasons (all P>0.05). Survivors' quality of life as assessed by the EuroQol 5D questionnaire and the New York Heart Association class did not differ between groups. Conclusions: IABP has no effect on all-cause mortality at 6-year long-term follow-up. Mortality is still very high, with two thirds of patients with cardiogenic shock dying despite contemporary treatment with revascularization therapy. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT00491036.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftCirculation
Jahrgang139
Ausgabenummer3
Seiten (von - bis)395-403
Seitenumfang9
ISSN0009-7322
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 15.01.2019

Fördermittel

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation, German Heart Research Foundation, German Cardiac Society, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte, and Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, as well as unrestricted grants from Maquet Cardiopulmonary AG, Hirrlingen, Germany, and Teleflex Medical, Everett, MA.

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren