Abstract
The place of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation is controversial. Meta-analyses on studies comparing GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist treatment regimens have suggested a comparatively lower efficacy of GnRH antagonists, which is likely to have influenced clinicians' attitudes. This report describes GnRH antagonist utilization for ovarian stimulation in Germany from 2000-2003. Data from the national IVF registry were analysed. The majority of ovarian stimulation cycles are still performed in long GnRH agonist protocols, although a significant increase in GnRH antagonist usage has been noted (P<0.0001). Two observations support the notion that GnRH antagonists are often utilized as a treatment option in cycles with an unfavourable a prioi prognosis: (i) the proportion of GnRH antagonist cycles increases with cycle rank (P<0.0001, χ2 for linear trend); and (ii) GnRH antagonist cycles are more often conducted in older patients as compared to GnRH agonist cycles (P<0.0001). This has important implications for interpreting clinical performance of GnRH antagonists outside a research context.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Human Reproduction |
| Jahrgang | 20 |
| Ausgabenummer | 9 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 2373-2375 |
| Seitenumfang | 3 |
| ISSN | 0268-1161 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 09.2005 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation: A treatment regimen of clinicians' second choice? Data from the German national IVF registry“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver