GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation: A treatment regimen of clinicians' second choice? Data from the German national IVF registry

Georg Griesinger*, Ricardo Felberbaum, Klaus Diedrich

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit
64 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

The place of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation is controversial. Meta-analyses on studies comparing GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist treatment regimens have suggested a comparatively lower efficacy of GnRH antagonists, which is likely to have influenced clinicians' attitudes. This report describes GnRH antagonist utilization for ovarian stimulation in Germany from 2000-2003. Data from the national IVF registry were analysed. The majority of ovarian stimulation cycles are still performed in long GnRH agonist protocols, although a significant increase in GnRH antagonist usage has been noted (P<0.0001). Two observations support the notion that GnRH antagonists are often utilized as a treatment option in cycles with an unfavourable a prioi prognosis: (i) the proportion of GnRH antagonist cycles increases with cycle rank (P<0.0001, χ2 for linear trend); and (ii) GnRH antagonist cycles are more often conducted in older patients as compared to GnRH agonist cycles (P<0.0001). This has important implications for interpreting clinical performance of GnRH antagonists outside a research context.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftHuman Reproduction
Jahrgang20
Ausgabenummer9
Seiten (von - bis)2373-2375
Seitenumfang3
ISSN0268-1161
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 09.2005

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation: A treatment regimen of clinicians' second choice? Data from the German national IVF registry“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren