TY - JOUR
T1 - GEC-ESTRO multicenter phase 3-trial: Accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy versus external beam whole breast irradiation: Early toxicity and patient compliance
AU - Ott, Oliver J.
AU - Strnad, Vratislav
AU - Hildebrandt, Guido
AU - Kauer-Dorner, Daniela
AU - Knauerhase, Hellen
AU - Major, Tibor
AU - Łyczek, Jaroslaw
AU - Guinot, José Luis
AU - Dunst, Jürgen
AU - Miguelez, Cristina Gutierrez
AU - Slampa, Pavel
AU - Allgäuer, Michael
AU - Lössl, Kristina
AU - Polat, Bülent
AU - Kovács, György
AU - Fischedick, Arnt René
AU - Wendt, Thomas G.
AU - Fietkau, Rainer
AU - Kortmann, Rolf Dieter
AU - Resch, Alexandra
AU - Kulik, Anna
AU - Arribas, Leo
AU - Niehoff, Peter
AU - Guedea, Ferran
AU - Schlamann, Annika
AU - Pötter, Richard
AU - Gall, Christine
AU - Malzer, Martina
AU - Uter, Wolfgang
AU - Polgár, Csaba
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by a grant from the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe e.V.; Grant Number 106288 ). The German Cancer Aid was not involved in: the study design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. No external writing assistance for this manuscript was engaged. We thank the patients, investigators, and institutions involved in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/7/1
Y1 - 2016/7/1
N2 - Background and purpose To compare early side effects and patient compliance of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with multicatheter brachytherapy to external beam whole breast irradiation (WBI) in a low-risk group of patients with breast cancer. Material and methods Between April 2004 and July 2009, 1328 patients with UICC stage 0–IIA breast cancer were randomized to receive WBI with 50 Gy and a boost of 10 Gy or APBI with either 32.0 Gy/8 fractions, or 30.1 Gy/7 fractions (HDR-brachytherapy), or 50 Gy/0.60–0.80 Gy per pulse (PDR-brachytherapy). This report focuses on early side-effects and patient compliance observed in 1186 analyzable patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00402519. Results Patient compliance was excellent in both arms. Both WBI and APBI were well tolerated with moderate early side-effects. No grade 4 toxicity had been observed. Grade 3 side effects were exclusively seen for early skin toxicity (radiation dermatitis) with 7% vs. 0.2% (p < 0.0001), and breast infection with 0% vs. 0.2% (p = n.s.) for patients treated with WBI and APBI. The incidence of grades 1–2 early side effects for WBI and APBI was 86% vs. 21% (p < 0.0001) for skin toxicity, 2% vs. 20% (p < 0.0001) for mild hematoma, and 2% vs. 5% (p = 0.01) for mild breast infection rates, respectively. No differences had been found regarding grades 1–2 early breast pain (26% vs. 29%, p = 0.23). Conclusions APBI with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy was tolerated very well and dramatically reduced early skin toxicity in comparison to standard WBI.
AB - Background and purpose To compare early side effects and patient compliance of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with multicatheter brachytherapy to external beam whole breast irradiation (WBI) in a low-risk group of patients with breast cancer. Material and methods Between April 2004 and July 2009, 1328 patients with UICC stage 0–IIA breast cancer were randomized to receive WBI with 50 Gy and a boost of 10 Gy or APBI with either 32.0 Gy/8 fractions, or 30.1 Gy/7 fractions (HDR-brachytherapy), or 50 Gy/0.60–0.80 Gy per pulse (PDR-brachytherapy). This report focuses on early side-effects and patient compliance observed in 1186 analyzable patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00402519. Results Patient compliance was excellent in both arms. Both WBI and APBI were well tolerated with moderate early side-effects. No grade 4 toxicity had been observed. Grade 3 side effects were exclusively seen for early skin toxicity (radiation dermatitis) with 7% vs. 0.2% (p < 0.0001), and breast infection with 0% vs. 0.2% (p = n.s.) for patients treated with WBI and APBI. The incidence of grades 1–2 early side effects for WBI and APBI was 86% vs. 21% (p < 0.0001) for skin toxicity, 2% vs. 20% (p < 0.0001) for mild hematoma, and 2% vs. 5% (p = 0.01) for mild breast infection rates, respectively. No differences had been found regarding grades 1–2 early breast pain (26% vs. 29%, p = 0.23). Conclusions APBI with interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy was tolerated very well and dramatically reduced early skin toxicity in comparison to standard WBI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992160836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.019
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.06.019
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 27422584
AN - SCOPUS:84992160836
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 120
SP - 119
EP - 123
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -