Abstract
BACKGROUND: Feedback and debriefing are crucial components of communication skills training, as they foster reflective learning and support the consolidation of core competencies. This review aims to systematically identify, map, and analyze the literature on how feedback is implemented in communication training in the context of healthcare education.
METHODS: This scoping review follows the 5 stages of the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and ÓMalley (2005). Four online databases-MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PsycInfo via Ovid, and ISI Web of Knowledge-were systematically searched to identify relevant studies.
RESULTS: 365 articles were included in the final analysis. Articles reported that communication skills training is frequently conducted in small-group settings, with participants receiving immediate post-event feedback from multiple perspectives. There was a notable lack of consistency in reporting details related to the characteristics of debriefers and standardized patients, as well as in the approaches used to guide the debriefing process. Structured, multiphase feedback methods were rarely described.
CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that, although the importance of feedback in communication skills training is widely acknowledged, it is rarely described in sufficient detail. A clear gap emerges between the theoretical understanding of feedback's value and characteristics and its structured implementation in practice. While there is a slight trend toward increased use of standardized feedback models, this appears unrelated to the specific setting, communication scenario, or profession.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development |
| Jahrgang | 13 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 23821205261431560 |
| ISSN | 2382-1205 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2026 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
-
SDG 4 – Qualitativ hochwertige Bildung
-
SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten
Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren
- Querschnittsbereich: Gesundheitswissenschaften: Logopädie, Ergotherapie, Physiotherapie und Hebammenwissenschaft
DFG-Fachsystematik
- 1.21-02 Allgemeines und Fachbezogenes Lehren und Lernen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Feedback and Debriefing in Healthcare Education to Improve Communication Skills: A Large Scoping Review“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver