TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and Acceptability of an Intervention Providing Computer-Generated Tailored Feedback to Target Alcohol Consumption and Depressive Symptoms in Proactively Recruited Health Care Patients and Reactively Recruited Media Volunteers: Results of a Pilot Study
AU - Krause, Kristian
AU - Guertler, Diana
AU - Moehring, Anne
AU - Batra, Anil
AU - Eck, Sandra
AU - Rumpf, Hans Jürgen
AU - Bischof, Gallus
AU - Lucht, Michael
AU - Freyer-Adam, Jennis
AU - Ulbricht, Sabina
AU - John, Ulrich
AU - Meyer, Christian
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the research consortium on addiction, AERIAL, funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant Numbers: FKZ 01EE1406F, FKZ 01EE1406E, FKZ 01EE406H). Preliminary work on the alcohol module of the intervention used was funded by the German Cancer Aid (Grant Numbers: 108376, 109737, 110676, 110543, 111346). Further funding was provided by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant Number: ME 3180/4-1). The funding sources had no further role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Background: A pre-post pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of a fully automatized computer-based intervention targeting hazardous drinking and depressiveness in proactively recruited health care patients (HCPs). To address the importance of the sample selection when testing interventions, HCPs were compared to media recruited volunteers (MVs). Method: In a multicenter screening program 2,773 HCPs were screened for hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms. MVs were recruited via media solicitation. Over a period of 6 months, study participants received 6 individualized counseling letters and weekly short messages. Pre-post data were analyzed for 30 participants (15 HCPs, 15 MVs). Intervention acceptability was assessed in post-intervention interviews conducted with 32 study participants. Results: MVs showed higher problem severity and motivation to change than HCPs. Over the course of the intervention both subsamples reduced regular binge drinking (HCPs: p = 0.016; MVs: p = 0.031) and depressiveness (HCPs: p = 0.020; MVs: p < 0.001). MVs further reduced average daily alcohol consumption (p = 0.034). The intervention received positive ratings from both subsamples, the alcohol module was rated more favorably by MVs than by HCPs (p = 0.012). Subsamples further differed in terms of intervention usage (p = 0.013). Conclusion: The intervention was technically and logistically feasible, well accepted, and may have the potential to reduce hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms in different populations. Subsamples differed in terms of problem severity, motivation to change, intervention usage, pre-post changes, and attitudes toward the intervention, showing that intervention development should involve the intended target populations to avoid biased conclusions on intervention effectiveness and acceptability.
AB - Background: A pre-post pilot study was conducted to test the feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of a fully automatized computer-based intervention targeting hazardous drinking and depressiveness in proactively recruited health care patients (HCPs). To address the importance of the sample selection when testing interventions, HCPs were compared to media recruited volunteers (MVs). Method: In a multicenter screening program 2,773 HCPs were screened for hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms. MVs were recruited via media solicitation. Over a period of 6 months, study participants received 6 individualized counseling letters and weekly short messages. Pre-post data were analyzed for 30 participants (15 HCPs, 15 MVs). Intervention acceptability was assessed in post-intervention interviews conducted with 32 study participants. Results: MVs showed higher problem severity and motivation to change than HCPs. Over the course of the intervention both subsamples reduced regular binge drinking (HCPs: p = 0.016; MVs: p = 0.031) and depressiveness (HCPs: p = 0.020; MVs: p < 0.001). MVs further reduced average daily alcohol consumption (p = 0.034). The intervention received positive ratings from both subsamples, the alcohol module was rated more favorably by MVs than by HCPs (p = 0.012). Subsamples further differed in terms of intervention usage (p = 0.013). Conclusion: The intervention was technically and logistically feasible, well accepted, and may have the potential to reduce hazardous drinking and depressive symptoms in different populations. Subsamples differed in terms of problem severity, motivation to change, intervention usage, pre-post changes, and attitudes toward the intervention, showing that intervention development should involve the intended target populations to avoid biased conclusions on intervention effectiveness and acceptability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063617416&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000499040
DO - 10.1159/000499040
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 30917380
AN - SCOPUS:85063617416
SN - 1022-6877
VL - 25
SP - 119
EP - 131
JO - European Addiction Research
JF - European Addiction Research
IS - 3
ER -