Different levels of circadian (de)synchrony ­– where does it hurt?

Ankita A.S. Galinde, Faheem Al-Mughales, Henrik Oster, Isabel Heyde*

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

A network of cellular timers ensures the maintenance of homeostasis by temporal modulation of physiological processes across the day. These so-called circadian clocks are synchronized to geophysical time by external time cues (or zeitgebers). In modern societies, natural environmental cycles are disrupted by artificial lighting, around-the-clock availability of food or shiftwork. Such contradictory zeitgeber input promotes chronodisruption, i.e., the perturbation of internal circadian rhythms, resulting in adverse health outcomes. While this phenomenon is well described, it is still poorly understood at which level of organization perturbed rhythms impact on health and wellbeing. In this review, we discuss different levels of chronodisruption and what is known about their health effects. We summarize the results of disrupted phase coherence between external and internal time vs. misalignment of tissue clocks amongst each other, i.e., internal desynchrony. Last, phase incoherence can also occur at the tissue level itself. Here, alterations in phase coordination can emerge between cellular clocks of the same tissue or between different clock genes within the single cell. A better understanding of the mechanisms of circadian misalignment and its effects on physiology will help to find effective tools to prevent or treat disorders arising from modern-day chronodisruptive environments.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer1323
ZeitschriftF1000Research
Jahrgang11
ISSN2046-1402
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2022

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Gehirn, Hormone, Verhalten - Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)

DFG-Fachsystematik

  • 205-17 Endokrinologie, Diabetologie, Metabolismus
  • 206-08 Kognitive und Systemische Humanneurowissenschaften

Zitieren