Abstract
The present study investigated differences in sequential learning between subjects who were or were not informed of the presence of a repeating sequence (intentional or incidental group, respectively). Subjects had to learn a 16-letter-long repeating sequence that was irregularly disrupted by deviating stimuli. Reaction times indicated that both groups learned the sequential regularities. Intentional learners showed a larger learning effect. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) recorded during performance of the task showed a reliably enhanced amplitude for the N2b- and P3b-components for deviant letters for intentional learners, but not for incidental learners. These results are discussed in the context of models proposing that different neural structures are involved in implicit and explicit serial learning.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Cognitive Brain Research |
| Jahrgang | 15 |
| Ausgabenummer | 2 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 116-126 |
| Seitenumfang | 11 |
| ISSN | 0926-6410 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 01.01.2003 |
Fördermittel
Support for this study was provided by the Berlin-Brandenburgische Academy of Sciences and the German Research Foundation (DFG) assigned to F.R.
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
-
SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten
Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren
- Forschungsschwerpunkt: Gehirn, Hormone, Verhalten - Center for Brain, Behavior and Metabolism (CBBM)
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver