Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Decision making for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt in refractory ascites and variceal bleeding: MELD, or not MELD, that is the question

Michael B. Pitton*, Tim Zimmermann, Philipp Mildenberger, Arndt Weinmann, Roman Kloeckner, Christoph Düber, Jens Mittler, Maria Hoppe-Lotichius, Gerd Otto

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Purpose The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score has been shown to predict 3-month prognosis following transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS) in liver cirrhosis; however, that score was derived from a mixed cohort, including patients with refractory ascites and variceal bleeding. This study re-evaluates the role of the MELD score and focuses on differences between both groups of patients. Methods A total of 301 patients (192 male and 109 female) received TIPS, 213 because of refractory ascites and 88 because of variceal bleeding. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify predictors of mortality and area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) were used to assess the prognostic capacity of the MELD score and of the results of predictors of the multivariate analyses. Results In refractory ascites, age, bilirubin and albumin were independent predictors of mortality. In variceal bleeding, emergency TIPS during ongoing bleeding, concomitant grade III ascites, history of hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, bilirubin and platelet count proved significant. AUROCs of the MELD score for 3-month survival yielded 0.543 and 0.836 for refractory ascites and variceal bleeding, respectively (P < 0.001). For 1-year survival, the respective AUROCs yielded 0.533 and 0.767 (P < 0.001). In contrast to MELD, the AUROCs based on the calculated risk scores of this study resulted in 0.660 and 0.876 for 3-month survival, and 0.665 and 0.835 for 1-year survival in patients with ascites and variceal bleeding, respectively. Conclusion In refractory ascites, the prognostic capability of MELD is significantly inferior compared to variceal bleeding. The results of our multivariate analyses and AUROC calculations corroborate the impact of different prognostic variables in patients undergoing TIPS for ascites and variceal bleeding.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Jahrgang33
Ausgabenummer1
Seiten (von - bis)E214-E222
ISSN0954-691X
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.12.2021

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
  2. SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur
    SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

  • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Biomedizintechnik

DFG-Fachsystematik

  • 2.22-30 Radiologie

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Decision making for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt in refractory ascites and variceal bleeding: MELD, or not MELD, that is the question“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren