Abstract
Despite substantial artificial intelligence (AI) research in various domains, limited attention has been given to its impact on the judi-ciary, and studies directly involving judges are rare. We address this gap by using 20 in-depth interviews to investigate German judges’ perspectives on AI. The exploratory study examines (1) the integration of AI in court proceedings by 2040, (2) the impact of increased use of AI on the role and independence of judges, and (3) whether AI decisions should supersede human judgments if they were superior to them. The findings reveal an expected trend toward further court digitalization and various AI use scenarios. Notably, opinions differ on the influence of AI on judicial independence and the precedence of machine decisions over human judgments. Overall, the judges surveyed hold diverse perspectives without a clear trend emerging, although a tendency toward a positive and less critical evaluation of AI in the judiciary is discernible.
| Titel in Übersetzung | Cui bono? Richterliche Entscheidungsfindung in Zeiten von KI: Eine qualitative Untersuchung zur Erwartungshaltung von Richter*innen in Deutschland |
|---|---|
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
| Zeitschrift | Zeitschrift fur Technikfolgenabschatzung in Theorie und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice |
| Jahrgang | 33 |
| Ausgabenummer | 1 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 14-20 |
| Seitenumfang | 7 |
| ISSN | 2568-020X |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 15.03.2024 |
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Cui bono? Richterliche Entscheidungsfindung in Zeiten von KI: Eine qualitative Untersuchung zur Erwartungshaltung von Richter*innen in Deutschland“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver