Comparison of five commercial extraction kits for subsequent membrane protein profiling

15 Zitate (Scopus)

Abstract

Membrane proteins account for 70-80% of all pharmaceutical targets emphasizing their clinical relevance. Identification of new, differentially expressed membrane proteins reflecting distinct disease properties is thus of high importance. Unfortunately, isolation and analysis of membrane-bound proteins is hampered by their relative low abundance in total cell lysates, their frequently large size and their hydrophobic properties. We thus aimed to identify protocols that allow for highly efficient isolation and purification of membrane-bound proteins for subsequent protein profiling. We present a comparative study of different membrane protein extraction methods that vary in total protein yield between 0.02 and 4.8 mg using constant cell pellets of the colorectal carcinoma cell line SW620. We also demonstrate by means of polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Western blot analysis that the majority of commercial membrane extraction kits harbor a substantial cytosolic contamination of their membranous fraction. Based on purity of membranous fraction, protein yield, time and costs, we show superiority of two commercial extraction kits for downstream proteome analyses of membrane proteins.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftCytotechnology
Jahrgang61
Ausgabenummer3
Seiten (von - bis)153-159
Seitenumfang7
ISSN0920-9069
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.12.2009

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Comparison of five commercial extraction kits for subsequent membrane protein profiling“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren