TY - JOUR
T1 - Cloud-Based Evaluation of Anatomical Structure Segmentation and Landmark Detection Algorithms: VISCERAL Anatomy Benchmarks
AU - Jimenez-Del-Toro, Oscar
AU - Muller, Henning
AU - Krenn, Markus
AU - Gruenberg, Katharina
AU - Taha, Abdel Aziz
AU - Winterstein, Marianne
AU - Eggel, Ivan
AU - Foncubierta-Rodriguez, Antonio
AU - Goksel, Orcun
AU - Jakab, Andras
AU - Kontokotsios, Georgios
AU - Langs, Georg
AU - Menze, Bjoern H.
AU - Salas Fernandez, Tomas
AU - Schaer, Roger
AU - Walleyo, Anna
AU - Weber, Marc Andre
AU - Dicente Cid, Yashin
AU - Gass, Tobias
AU - Heinrich, Mattias
AU - Jia, Fucang
AU - Kahl, Fredrik
AU - Kechichian, Razmig
AU - Mai, Dominic
AU - Spanier, Assaf B.
AU - Vincent, Graham
AU - Wang, Chunliang
AU - Wyeth, Daniel
AU - Hanbury, Allan
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Variations in the shape and appearance of anatomical structures in medical images are often relevant radiological signs of disease. Automatic tools can help automate parts of this manual process. A cloud-based evaluation framework is presented in this paper including results of benchmarking current state-of-the-art medical imaging algorithms for anatomical structure segmentation and landmark detection: the VISCERAL Anatomy benchmarks. The algorithms are implemented in virtual machines in the cloud where participants can only access the training data and can be run privately by the benchmark administrators to objectively compare their performance in an unseen common test set. Overall, 120 computed tomography and magnetic resonance patient volumes were manually annotated to create a standard Gold Corpus containing a total of 1295 structures and 1760 landmarks. Ten participants contributed with automatic algorithms for the organ segmentation task, and three for the landmark localization task. Different algorithms obtained the best scores in the four available imaging modalities and for subsets of anatomical structures. The annotation framework, resulting data set, evaluation setup, results and performance analysis from the three VISCERAL Anatomy benchmarks are presented in this article. Both the VISCERAL data set and Silver Corpus generated with the fusion of the participant algorithms on a larger set of non-manually-annotated medical images are available to the research community.
AB - Variations in the shape and appearance of anatomical structures in medical images are often relevant radiological signs of disease. Automatic tools can help automate parts of this manual process. A cloud-based evaluation framework is presented in this paper including results of benchmarking current state-of-the-art medical imaging algorithms for anatomical structure segmentation and landmark detection: the VISCERAL Anatomy benchmarks. The algorithms are implemented in virtual machines in the cloud where participants can only access the training data and can be run privately by the benchmark administrators to objectively compare their performance in an unseen common test set. Overall, 120 computed tomography and magnetic resonance patient volumes were manually annotated to create a standard Gold Corpus containing a total of 1295 structures and 1760 landmarks. Ten participants contributed with automatic algorithms for the organ segmentation task, and three for the landmark localization task. Different algorithms obtained the best scores in the four available imaging modalities and for subsets of anatomical structures. The annotation framework, resulting data set, evaluation setup, results and performance analysis from the three VISCERAL Anatomy benchmarks are presented in this article. Both the VISCERAL data set and Silver Corpus generated with the fusion of the participant algorithms on a larger set of non-manually-annotated medical images are available to the research community.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994495874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMI.2016.2578680
DO - 10.1109/TMI.2016.2578680
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 27305669
AN - SCOPUS:84994495874
SN - 0278-0062
VL - 35
SP - 2459
EP - 2475
JO - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
JF - IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
IS - 11
M1 - 7488206
ER -