Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Clinical practice and implications of biomarker testing in biliary tract cancer: An observational study

Sabrina Welland, Ann Kristin Zöller, Ilektra A. Mavroeidi, Aurelie Tomczak, Christian Müller, Dong Yawen, Danmei Zhang, Felix Keil, Maria Pangerl, Taotao Zhou, Hossein Taghizadeh, Sebastian Lange, Maximilian N. Kinzler, Kataryna Shmanko, Maryam Barsch, Carolin Zimpel, Angela Djanani, Henning Schulze-Bergkamen, Julius Keyl, Florian LükeThomas Wirth, Michael Dill, Thomas Longerich, Sophia Petschnak, Jens U. Marquardt, Michael Quante, Arndt Weinmann, Dirk Walter, Nicole Pfarr, Gerald Prager, Bernhard Doleschal, Maria A. Gonzalez-Carmona, Rainer Günther, Alexander Scheiter, Stefan Böck, Stephan Bartels, Thomas Gruenberger, Marino Venerito, Christoph Springfeld, Stefan Kasper, Anna Saborowski*, Arndt Vogel

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background & Aims: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are aggressive malignancies with limited treatment options. Owing to the high frequency of actionable genomic alterations (GA) and the availability of targeted therapies, molecular testing has become increasingly important; however, its clinical implementation remains inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate real-world molecular testing practices, characterize the BTC molecular landscape, and assess the prognostic and predictive relevance of selected GA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed genomic and clinical data from 1,521 patients treated at 18 centers in Germany and Austria. A side-by-side comparison of clinical grade reports generated on two different sequencing platforms was performed for 90 patients. Results: Twenty-four different NGS panels were used across 18 centers. A comparative analysis highlighted the significant variability in reports used to inform therapeutic decisions in clinical practice. Although there were substantial differences in the number of GA covered, the broader panels identified a similar number of actionable GA, indicating that key therapeutic targets are sufficiently represented. Integration with clinical data suggested that certain GA, such as HER2 amplifications (3%), BRAFV600E mutations (2%), and FGFR2 alterations (14%), may have prognostic significance beyond their predictive value. Patients with actionable alterations (610, 40%) that were treated accordingly (n = 204, 13%) had prolonged overall survival (31.8 months vs. 22.8 months, p <0.01). Conclusion: Standardized biomarker testing is crucial for effective integration of targeted therapies in the management of BTC. Our findings reinforce the value of targeted treatments and underscore the predictive and prognostic significance of selected GA. Impact and implications: Genomic profiling is recommended in patients with biliary tract cancers (BTC) but lacks harmonization across platforms and centers. By retrospectively analyzing genomic and clinical information from 1,521 patients with BTC diagnosed and treated at 18 centers in Germany and Austria, we provide real-world insights into the implementation of molecular profiling in BTC, highlighting variability in next generation sequencing-based testing and its impact on the detection of genomic alterations. Standardized molecular testing strategies will be key to enable the integration of more consistent and comparable genomic datasets across studies. Further, by elucidating the prognostic relevance of individual genomic alterations, our insights carry significant implications for interpreting single-arm clinical trials within genomically stratified patient cohorts and underscore the importance of randomized studies to delineate the benefit of targeted therapies.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer101635
ZeitschriftJHEP Reports
Jahrgang8
Ausgabenummer1
ISSN2589-5559
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.2026

Fördermittel

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) project numbers 493345156 (to ASa) and 348083549 (to AV). ASa was supported by the German Cancer Aid (70114101). AV was supported by the European-Latin American ESCALON consortium, funded by the EU Horizon 2020 program (project number 825510). ASa and AV are supported by the ERA-NET TRANSCAN-3 JTC22 consortium “PRECEDENCE.” This publication is based on work from COST Action CA22125, supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). We thank the Molecular Tumor Board Freiburg (MTB-FR) Network (Center for Personalized Medicine, University Freiburg - Medical Center) for providing molecular and clinical data. JUM was supported by a grant from the Wilhelm-Sander Foundation. IAM was supported by the Clinician Scientist Program of the University Medicine Essen Clinician Scientist Academy (UMEA), Faculty of Medicine, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). Part of the work (panel sequencing of the retrospective iCCA cohort, MHH) was supported by a research grant provided by AstraZeneca (to ASa and AV).

TrägerTrägernummer
European-Latin American
Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung
University Medicine Essen Clinician Scientist Academy
AstraZeneca
European Cooperation in Science and TechnologyCA22125
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme825510
Deutsche Krebshilfe70114101
ERA-NETTRANSCAN-3 JTC22
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft348083549, 493345156

    UN SDGs

    Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

    1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
      SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

    Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

    • Profilbereich: Lübeck Integrated Oncology Network (LION)

    DFG-Fachsystematik

    • 2.22-14 Hämatologie, Onkologie
    • 2.22-15 Gastroenterologie

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Clinical practice and implications of biomarker testing in biliary tract cancer: An observational study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Zitieren