Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Clinical features and survival of patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis defined by the updated WHO classification

Jakub Trizuljak, Wolfgang R. Sperr, Lucie Nekvindová, Hanneke O. Elberink, Karoline V. Gleixner, Aleksandra Gorska, Magdalena Lange, Karin Hartmann, Anja Illerhaus, Massimiliano Bonifacio, Cecelia Perkins, Chiara Elena, Luca Malcovati, Anna B. Fortina, Khalid Shoumariyeh, Mohamad Jawhar, Roberta Zanotti, Patrizia Bonadonna, Francesca Caroppo, Alexander ZinkMassimo Triggiani, Roberta Parente, Nikolas von Bubnoff, Akif S. Yavuz, Hans Hägglund, Mattias Mattsson, Jens Panse, Nadja Jäkel, Alex Kilbertus, Olivier Hermine, Michel Arock, David Fuchs, Vito Sabato, Knut Brockow, Agnes Bretterklieber, Marek Niedoszytko, Björn van Anrooij, Andreas Reiter, Jason Gotlib, Hanneke C. Kluin-Nelemans, Jiri Mayer, Michael Doubek*, Peter Valent

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: In indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM), several risk factors of disease progression have been identified. Previous studies, performed with limited patient numbers, have also shown that the clinical course in ISM is stable and comparable to that of cutaneous mastocytosis (CM). The aim of this project was to compare the prognosis of patients with ISM with that of patients with CM. Methods: We employed a dataset of 1993 patients from the registry of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) to compare outcomes of ISM and CM. Results: We found that overall survival (OS) is worse in ISM compared to CM. Moreover, in patients with typical ISM, bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM), and smoldering SM (SSM), 4.1% of disease progressions have been observed (4.9% of progressions in typical ISM group, 1.7% in BMM, and 9.4% in SSM). Progressions to advanced SM were observed in 2.9% of these patients. In contrast, six patients with CM (1.7%) converted to ISM and no definitive progression to advanced SM was found. No significant differences in OS and event-free survival (EFS) were found when comparing ISM, BMM, and SSM. Higher risk of both progression and death was significantly associated with male gender, worse performance status, and organomegaly. Conclusion: Our data confirm the clinical impact of the WHO classification that separates ISM from CM and from other SM variants.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftAllergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Jahrgang75
Ausgabenummer8
Seiten (von - bis)1923-1934
Seitenumfang12
ISSN0105-4538
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.08.2020

Fördermittel

WRS received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, Thermo Fisher, Diciphera, Incyte, Celgene, Jazz and travel grants from Pfizer and Roche. HOE received honoraria from ALK‐Abelló, Chiesi, MEDA Pharma, Novartis, Blueprint. KVG received honoraria from Novartis, Roche, BMS, Sanofi, Incyte and travel grants from Roche and AbbVie. ML received honoraria from Novartis. KH received honoraria from Novartis, ALK, Blueprint, Deciphera and research funding from Euroimmun. MB received honoraria from Amgen, Incyte, Pfizer and research funding from Novartis. CE received honoraria from Novartis and Pfizer. MJ received honoraria from Novartis, Blueprint, Deciphera. RZ is consultant Deciphera and Novartis. AZ received honoraria or participated in trials from AbbVie, Almirall, Beiersdorf Dermo Medical, Bencard Allergie, BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen‐Cilag, Miltenyi Biotec, Novartis, Sanofi‐Aventis, Takeda Pharma. MT received honoraria from Deciphera, Blueprint, Novartis. NB received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Amgen, Novartis and BMS and research funding from Novartis. JP received honoraria from Alexion, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grünenthal, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Chugai. DF received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche travel grants from Roche. VS received honoraria from Novartis, Termofisher, Shire, Stallergens. KB received honoraria from Novartis, Phadia (Thermo Fisher), Meda, BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc outside. BA received honoraria from Novartis. AR received honoraria from Novartis, BMS, Deciphera, Blueprint, Baxalta/Shire and research funding from Novartis. JG received honoraria from Blueprint, Deciphera, Gilead, Incyte, Novartis and research funding from Blueprint, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, Deciphera, Gilead, Incyte, Pharmacyclics, Promedior, Seattle Genetics. JM received honoraria from for Novartis, Gilead, BMS. MD received honoraria from for Roche, AbbVie, Novartis, Gilead, AOP Pharmaceuticals, Janssen‐Cilag. PV has received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Deciphera, Incyte, Blueprint, Celgene and research funds from Pfizer, Incyte, Celgene. JT, LN, AG, AI, CP, LM, ABF, FC, KS, RP, MN, PB, ASY, HH, MM, NJ, AK, OH, MA, AB, HCKN have nothing to disclose.

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Clinical features and survival of patients with indolent systemic mastocytosis defined by the updated WHO classification“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren