Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Abstract

Machine learning classifications of first-episode psychosis (FEP) using neuroimaging have predominantly analyzed brain volumes. Some studies examined cortical thickness, but most of them have used parcellation approaches with data from single sites, which limits claims of generalizability. To address these limitations, we conducted a large-scale, multi-site analysis of cortical thickness comparing parcellations and vertex-wise approaches. By leveraging the multi-site nature of the study, we further investigated how different demographical and site-dependent variables affected predictions. Finally, we assessed relationships between predictions and clinical variables. 428 subjects (147 females, mean age 27.14) with FEP and 448 (230 females, mean age 27.06) healthy controls were enrolled in 8 centers by the ClassiFEP group. All subjects underwent a structural MRI and were clinically assessed. Cortical thickness parcellation (68 areas) and full cortical maps (20,484 vertices) were extracted. Linear Support Vector Machine was used for classification within a repeated nested cross-validation framework. Vertex-wise thickness maps outperformed parcellation-based methods with a balanced accuracy of 66.2% and an Area Under the Curve of 72%. By stratifying our sample for MRI scanner, we increased generalizability across sites. Temporal brain areas resulted as the most influential in the classification. The predictive decision scores significantly correlated with age at onset, duration of treatment, and positive symptoms. In conclusion, although far from the threshold of clinical relevance, temporal cortical thickness proved to classify between FEP subjects and healthy individuals. The assessment of site-dependent variables permitted an increase in the across-site generalizability, thus attempting to address an important machine learning limitation.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
ZeitschriftEuropean Neuropsychopharmacology
Jahrgang47
Seiten (von - bis)34-47
Seitenumfang14
ISSN0924-977X
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 06.2021

Fördermittel

SS was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) ( Sm 68/3-1 ). JRR and AG acknowledge support from the DFG ( RE 1123/11-1 , GU 1108/3-1 ). DFG had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. BMBF and the Max Planck Society funded RS's salary. RS received honoraria for one lecture from Lundbeck. These institutions had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. FS and YZ were partially supported by the project ‘Sustainability for the National Institute of Mental Health’ (grant number LO1611), and FS was partially supported by Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic , grant nr. 16-32696A . The Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. OeFOe was supported by the “Else-Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung” through the Clinician Scientist Program “EKFS-Translational Psychiatry”. EKFS had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. This work was supported by the UK Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Specialist Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health award to the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) and the Institute of Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London. The NIHR had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. PB was partially supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health ( RF-2016-02364582 ). GS was partially supported by Italian Ministry of Health grant RC 14-15-16-17-18-19-20/A . The Italian Ministry of Health had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

  1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
    SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
  2. SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten
    SDG 10 – Weniger Ungleichheiten

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Classification of first-episode psychosis using cortical thickness: A large multicenter MRI study“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Zitieren