Zur Hauptnavigation wechseln Zur Suche wechseln Zum Hauptinhalt wechseln

Biological, as opposed to classic antipsoriatic drug or apremilast, treatment mitigates the risk of death and cardiovascular disease in psoriasis

Khalaf Kridin, Katja Bieber, Artem Vorobyev, Eva Lotta Moderegger, Henning Olbrich, Marlene A. Ludwig, Bernard Gershater, Gema Hernandez, Henner Zirpel, Diamant Thaci, Ralf J. Ludwig*

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular comorbidity increases morbidity and mortality in psoriasis. Systemic treatments, particularly biologics, are effective in alleviating skin and joint inflammation. Conversely, the impact of systemic therapy on cardiovascular disease risk and mortality in psoriasis remains uncertain. Methods: Impact of systemic treatments on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease risk in psoriasis patients' electronic health records (EHRs) from TriNetX was assessed. Treatment categories included apremilast, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), IL23i, TNFi, and classic antipsoriatic drugs. Index event was the first prescription of each treatment, requiring a two-year continuous treatment with exclusion of other systemic antipsoriatic drugs. Propensity-score matching was used to improve comparability. Sensitivity analyses ensured study robustness. Findings: In descriptive analysis, all-cause mortality rates were 0.61% (classic antipsoriatics, n = 7929), 0.91% (apremilast, n = 1101), 0.00% (IL17i, n = 677), 0.81% (IL23i, n = 1242), and 0.20% (TNFi, n = 6468). Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were documented in 8.49% (classic antipsoriatics), 5.14% (apremilast), 2.99% (IL17i), 2.09% (IL23i), and 3.74% (TNFi) EHRs. Propensity-score matching showed all-cause mortality rates of 0.23% for any biologic vs. 0.49% for classic antipsoriatics or apremilast, resulting in an HR of 2.21 (95% CI 1.21–3.71, p = 0.0073). MACE risk was also higher with classic antipsoriatics or apremilast (HR 1.66, CI 1.43–1.93, p < 0.0001). The majority of findings were consistent across all four sensitivity analyses. No significant differences in all-cause mortality or MACE risk were observed among biologics. Interpretation: Biological treatment, as opposed to classic antipsoriatic drugs or apremilast, reduces risk of death and cardiovascular disease in psoriasis. Prospective trials are required to validate these findings. Funding: DFG: EXC 2167 and LU 877/25-1. State of Schleswig Holstein: Excellence-Chair Program.

OriginalspracheEnglisch
Aufsatznummer105485
ZeitschrifteBioMedicine
Jahrgang111
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 01.2025

Fördermittel

This study was funded by the Cluster of Excellence “Precision Medicine in Chronic Inflammation” (EXC 2167), the Collaborative Research Centre “Pathomechanisms of Antibody-mediated Autoimmunity” (SFB 1526), the Individual Research Grant DFG LU 877/25-1, all from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the Schleswig-Holstein Excellence-Chair Program from the State of Schleswig Holstein,

TrägerTrägernummer
State of Schleswig-Holstein*
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

    UN SDGs

    Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

    1. SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
      SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen

    Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

    • Forschungsschwerpunkt: Infektion und Entzündung - Zentrum für Infektions- und Entzündungsforschung Lübeck (ZIEL)
    • Zentren: Center for Research on Inflammation of the Skin (CRIS)
    • Zentren: Universitäres Herzzentrum Lübeck (UHZL)

    DFG-Fachsystematik

    • 2.21-05 Immunologie
    • 2.22-19 Dermatologie
    • 2.22-09 Pharmakologie
    • 2.22-12 Kardiologie, Angiologie

    Fingerprint

    Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Biological, as opposed to classic antipsoriatic drug or apremilast, treatment mitigates the risk of death and cardiovascular disease in psoriasis“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

    Zitieren