TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmarking of minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy
T2 - European multicentre study
AU - European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)
AU - Giani, Alessandro
AU - Van Ramshorst, Tess
AU - Mazzola, Michele
AU - Bassi, Claudio
AU - Esposito, Alessandro
AU - De Pastena, Matteo
AU - Edwin, Bjørn
AU - Sahakyan, Mushegh
AU - Kleive, Dyre
AU - Jah, Asif
AU - Van Laarhoven, Stijn
AU - Boggi, Ugo
AU - Kauffman, Emanuele Federico
AU - Casadei, Riccardo
AU - Ricci, Claudio
AU - Dokmak, Safi
AU - Ftériche, Fadhel Samir
AU - White, Steven A.
AU - Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
AU - Butturini, Giovanni
AU - Frigerio, Isabella
AU - Zerbi, Alessandro
AU - Capretti, Giovanni
AU - Pando, Elizabeth
AU - Sutcliffe, Robert P.
AU - Marudanayagam, Ravi
AU - Fusai, Giuseppe Kito
AU - Fabre, Jean Michel
AU - Björnsson, Bergthor
AU - Timmermann, Lea
AU - Soonawalla, Zahir
AU - Burdio, Fernando
AU - Keck, Tobias
AU - Hackert, Thilo
AU - Koerkamp, Bas Groot
AU - D'Hondt, Mathieu
AU - Coratti, Andrea
AU - Pessaux, Patrick
AU - Pietrabissa, Andrea
AU - Al-Sarireh, Bilal
AU - Marino, Marco V.
AU - Molenaar, Quintus
AU - Yip, Vincent
AU - Besselink, Marc
AU - Ferrari, Giovanni
AU - Abu Hilal, Mohammad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Background: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS). Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk. Results: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87). Conclusion: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.
AB - Background: Benchmarking is the process to used assess the best achievable results and compare outcomes with that standard. This study aimed to assess best achievable outcomes in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (MIDPS). Methods: This retrospective study included consecutive patients undergoing MIDPS for any indication, between 2003 and 2019, in 31 European centres. Benchmarks of the main clinical outcomes were calculated according to the Achievable Benchmark of Care (ABC™) method. After identifying independent risk factors for severe morbidity and conversion, risk-adjusted ABCs were calculated for each subgroup of patients at risk. Results: A total of 1595 patients were included. The ABC was 2.5 per cent for conversion and 8.4 per cent for severe morbidity. ABC values were 160 min for duration of operation time, 8.3 per cent for POPF, 1.8 per cent for reoperation, and 0 per cent for mortality. Multivariable analysis showed that conversion was associated with male sex (OR 1.48), BMI exceeding 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.42), multivisceral resection (OR 3.04), and laparoscopy (OR 2.24). Increased risk of severe morbidity was associated with ASA fitness grade above II (OR 1.60), multivisceral resection (OR 1.88), and robotic approach (OR 1.87). Conclusion: The benchmark values obtained using the ABC method represent optimal outcomes from best achievable care, including low complication rates and zero mortality. These benchmarks should be used to set standards to improve patient outcomes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140144605&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/bjs/znac204
DO - 10.1093/bjs/znac204
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 35834788
AN - SCOPUS:85140144605
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 109
SP - 1124
EP - 1130
JO - British Journal of Surgery
JF - British Journal of Surgery
IS - 11
ER -