Abstract
Mepitel® Film (MEP) and standard care (STD) were compared for radiation dermatitis in SCCHN patients. This trial was stopped prematurely since13/28 patients did not tolerate MEP. Grade ≥2 dermatitis: 34.8% (MEP) vs. 35.7% (STD) at 50 Gy, 65.2% vs. 59.3% at 60 Gy. MEP was unsatisfactorily tolerated and appeared not superior (NCT03047174).
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Zeitschrift | Radiotherapy and Oncology |
| Jahrgang | 139 |
| Seiten (von - bis) | 79-82 |
| Seitenumfang | 4 |
| ISSN | 0167-8140 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 10.2019 |
Fördermittel
As part of the project InnoCan, the RAREST-01 study was funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Deutschland-Danmark program (reference: Innoc 11-1.0-15). The funding body has no role in the design of the study, in collection, analysis and interpretation of the data and in writing of the manuscript.
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „A randomized trial (RAREST-01) comparing Mepitel® Film and standard care for prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients irradiated for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN)“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver