TY - JOUR
T1 - A prospective interventional study evaluating seizure activity during a radiotherapy course for high-grade gliomas (SURF-ROGG)
AU - Rades, Dirk
AU - Witteler, Jaspar
AU - Olbrich, Denise
AU - Trillenberg, Peter
AU - Schild, Steven E.
AU - Tvilsted, Soeren
AU - Kjaer, Troels W.
N1 - Funding Information:
The SURF-ROGG trial is part of the NorDigHealth project and funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the Interreg Deutschland-Danmark program (reference: 087–1.1-18). Sponsor is the University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Funding body and sponsor will have no role with respect to designing the study, handling the data and writing the article. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Background: Gliomas are often associated with symptoms including seizures. Most patients with high-grade gliomas are treated with radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy. Since irradiation causes inflammation, it may initially aggravate symptoms. Studies focusing on seizure activity during radiotherapy for gliomas are not available. Such knowledge may improve patient monitoring and anti-epileptic treatment. This study evaluates seizure activity during radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Methods: The primary objective this prospective interventional study is the evaluation of seizure activity during a course of radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Progression of seizure activity is defined as increased frequency of seizures by > 50%, increased severity of seizures, or initiation/increase by ≥25% of anti-epileptic medication. Seizure frequency up to 6 weeks following radiotherapy and electroencephalography activity typical for epilepsy will also be evaluated. Patients keep a seizure diary during and up to 6 weeks following radiotherapy. Every day, they will document number (and type) of seizures and anti-epileptic medication. Once a week, the findings of the diary are checked and discussed with a neurologist to initiate or adjust anti-epileptic medication, if necessary. Patients complete a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the seizure diary. If the dissatisfaction rate is > 40%, the seizure diary will be considered not suitable for the investigated indication. Thirty-five patients (32 patients plus drop-outs) should be enrolled. With this sample size, a one-sample binomial test with a one-sided significance level of 2.5% has a power of 80% to yield statistical significance, if the rate of patients with progression of seizure activity is 30% (rate under the alternative hypothesis), assuming a ‘natural’ background progression-rate of 10% without radiotherapy (null hypothesis). Discussion: If an increase in seizure activity during a course of radiotherapy for high-grade glioma occurs, the findings of this study may pave the way for a larger prospective trial and will likely lead to closer patient monitoring and better anti-epileptic treatment. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04552756); registered on 16th of September, 2020.
AB - Background: Gliomas are often associated with symptoms including seizures. Most patients with high-grade gliomas are treated with radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy. Since irradiation causes inflammation, it may initially aggravate symptoms. Studies focusing on seizure activity during radiotherapy for gliomas are not available. Such knowledge may improve patient monitoring and anti-epileptic treatment. This study evaluates seizure activity during radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Methods: The primary objective this prospective interventional study is the evaluation of seizure activity during a course of radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Progression of seizure activity is defined as increased frequency of seizures by > 50%, increased severity of seizures, or initiation/increase by ≥25% of anti-epileptic medication. Seizure frequency up to 6 weeks following radiotherapy and electroencephalography activity typical for epilepsy will also be evaluated. Patients keep a seizure diary during and up to 6 weeks following radiotherapy. Every day, they will document number (and type) of seizures and anti-epileptic medication. Once a week, the findings of the diary are checked and discussed with a neurologist to initiate or adjust anti-epileptic medication, if necessary. Patients complete a questionnaire regarding their satisfaction with the seizure diary. If the dissatisfaction rate is > 40%, the seizure diary will be considered not suitable for the investigated indication. Thirty-five patients (32 patients plus drop-outs) should be enrolled. With this sample size, a one-sample binomial test with a one-sided significance level of 2.5% has a power of 80% to yield statistical significance, if the rate of patients with progression of seizure activity is 30% (rate under the alternative hypothesis), assuming a ‘natural’ background progression-rate of 10% without radiotherapy (null hypothesis). Discussion: If an increase in seizure activity during a course of radiotherapy for high-grade glioma occurs, the findings of this study may pave the way for a larger prospective trial and will likely lead to closer patient monitoring and better anti-epileptic treatment. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04552756); registered on 16th of September, 2020.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104101618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/4c59e75c-3327-3dcb-a2f1-2166f1a33254/
U2 - 10.1186/s12885-021-08121-y
DO - 10.1186/s12885-021-08121-y
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 33836671
AN - SCOPUS:85104101618
SN - 1471-2407
VL - 21
SP - 386
JO - BMC Cancer
JF - BMC Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 386
ER -