TY - JOUR
T1 - A new survival score for patients with brain metastases who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone
AU - Rades, Dirk
AU - Dziggel, Liesa
AU - Nagy, Viorica
AU - Šegedin, Barbara
AU - Lohynska, Radka
AU - Veninga, Theo
AU - Khoa, Mai T.
AU - Trang, Ngo T.
AU - Schild, Steven E.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/7
Y1 - 2013/7
N2 - Background and purpose Survival scores for patients with brain metastasis exist. However, the treatment regimens used to create these scores were heterogeneous. This study aimed to develop and validate a survival score in homogeneously treated patients. Materials and methods Eight-hundred-and-eighty- two patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy of WBRT alone were randomly assigned to a test group (N = 441) or a validation group (N = 441). In the multivariate analysis of the test group, age, performance status, extracranial metastasis, and systemic treatment prior to WBRT were independent predictors of survival. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (in %) by 10. Scores were summed and total scores ranged from 6 to 19 points. Patients were divided into four prognostic groups. Results The 6-month survival rates were 4% for 6-9 points, 29% for 10-14 points, 62% for 15-17 points, and 93% for 17-18 points (p < 0.001) in the test group. The survival rates were 3%, 28%, 54% and 96%, respectively (p < 0.001) in the validation group. Conclusions Since the 6-month survival rates in the validation group were very similar to the test group, this new score (WBRT-30) appears valid and reproducible. It can help making treatment choices and stratifying patients in future trials.
AB - Background and purpose Survival scores for patients with brain metastasis exist. However, the treatment regimens used to create these scores were heterogeneous. This study aimed to develop and validate a survival score in homogeneously treated patients. Materials and methods Eight-hundred-and-eighty- two patients receiving 10 × 3 Gy of WBRT alone were randomly assigned to a test group (N = 441) or a validation group (N = 441). In the multivariate analysis of the test group, age, performance status, extracranial metastasis, and systemic treatment prior to WBRT were independent predictors of survival. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (in %) by 10. Scores were summed and total scores ranged from 6 to 19 points. Patients were divided into four prognostic groups. Results The 6-month survival rates were 4% for 6-9 points, 29% for 10-14 points, 62% for 15-17 points, and 93% for 17-18 points (p < 0.001) in the test group. The survival rates were 3%, 28%, 54% and 96%, respectively (p < 0.001) in the validation group. Conclusions Since the 6-month survival rates in the validation group were very similar to the test group, this new score (WBRT-30) appears valid and reproducible. It can help making treatment choices and stratifying patients in future trials.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883160803&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.009
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.009
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 23830191
AN - SCOPUS:84883160803
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 108
SP - 123
EP - 127
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 1
ER -