Abstract
Today’s network processor utilize parallel processing in order to cope with the traffic growth and wire-speed of current and future network technologies. In this paper, we study two important parallel programming models for network processors: run to completion and pipelining. In particular, the packet flow of a standard network application, IPv4 Forwarding, through two examined network processors, IBM PowerNP NP4GS3 and Intel IXP1200, is reviewed and characterized in respect to their programming models. Based on a benchmark for PC-cluster SANs, their application throughput and latency for Gigabit Ethernet is investigated and compared to a commercial, ASIC-based switch. It is shown that in this scenario network processors can compete with hard-wired solutions.
| Originalsprache | Englisch |
|---|---|
| Titel | ARCS 2004 - Organic and Pervasive Computing, Workshops Proceedings, March 26, 2004, Augsburg, Germany |
| Seitenumfang | 10 |
| Band | 41 |
| Herausgeber (Verlag) | Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn |
| Erscheinungsdatum | 2004 |
| Seiten | 390-399 |
| ISBN (Print) | 3-88579-370-9 |
| Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 2004 |
UN SDGs
Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung
-
SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur
Fingerprint
Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „A Comparison of Parallel Programming Models of Network Processors“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.Zitieren
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver