TY - JOUR
T1 - A collective European experience with left atrial appendage suture ligation using the LARIAT+ device
AU - Tilz, Roland Richard
AU - Fink, Thomas
AU - Bartus, Krzysztof
AU - Wong, Tom
AU - Vogler, Julia
AU - Nentwich, Karin
AU - Panniker, Sandeep
AU - Fang, Qizhi
AU - Piorkowski, Christopher
AU - Liosis, Spyridon
AU - Gaspar, Thomas
AU - Sawan, Noureddin
AU - Metzner, Andreas
AU - Nietlispach, Fabian
AU - Maisano, Francesco
AU - Lee, Randall J.
AU - Foran, John P.
AU - Ouyang, Feifan
AU - Sievert, Horst
AU - Deneke, Thomas
AU - Kuck, Karl Heinz
N1 - Funding Information:
Part of analysed data delivered from Prof. Bartus was supported by the National Science Center (2014/13/D/NZ5/01351 and 2015/17/B/NZ5/ 00125).
Funding Information:
Conflict of interest: T.F. received travel grants from SentreHeart. K.B. is a consultant for SentreHeart. R.J.L. is a consultant to and has equity in SentreHeart. R.T. received travel grants from SentreHeart. The other authors report no relevant conflicts of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: [email protected].
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Aims: We report the collective European experience of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) suture ligation using the recent generation LARIAT+ suture delivery device. Methods and results: A total of 141 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC), thrombo-embolic events despite OAC or electrical LAA isolation were enrolled at seven European hospitals to undergo LAA ligation. Patients were followed up by clinical visits and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) following LAA closure. Left atrial appendage ligation was completed in 138/141 patients (97.8%). Three patients did not undergo attempted deployment of the LARIAT device due to pericardial adhesion after previous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation (n = 1), a pericardial access-related complication (n = 1), and multiple posterior LAA lobes (n = 1). Serious 30-day procedural adverse events occurred in 4/141 patients (2.8%). There were two device-related LAA perforations (1.4%) not resulting in any corrective intervention as the LAA was completely sealed with the LARIAT. Minor adverse events occurred in 19 patients (13.5%), including two pericardial effusions due to procedure-related pericarditis requiring pericardiocentesis. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed after LAA ligation in 103/138 patients (74.6%) after a mean of 181 ± 72 days. Complete LAA closure was documented in 100 patients (97.1%). Two patients (1.8% of patients with follow-up) experienced a transient ischaemic attack at 4 and 7 months follow-up, although there was no leak observed with TOE. There were two deaths during long-term follow-up which were both not device related. Conclusion: Initial experience with the LARIAT+ device demonstrates feasibility of LAA exclusion. Further larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted.
AB - Aims: We report the collective European experience of percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) suture ligation using the recent generation LARIAT+ suture delivery device. Methods and results: A total of 141 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC), thrombo-embolic events despite OAC or electrical LAA isolation were enrolled at seven European hospitals to undergo LAA ligation. Patients were followed up by clinical visits and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) following LAA closure. Left atrial appendage ligation was completed in 138/141 patients (97.8%). Three patients did not undergo attempted deployment of the LARIAT device due to pericardial adhesion after previous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation (n = 1), a pericardial access-related complication (n = 1), and multiple posterior LAA lobes (n = 1). Serious 30-day procedural adverse events occurred in 4/141 patients (2.8%). There were two device-related LAA perforations (1.4%) not resulting in any corrective intervention as the LAA was completely sealed with the LARIAT. Minor adverse events occurred in 19 patients (13.5%), including two pericardial effusions due to procedure-related pericarditis requiring pericardiocentesis. Transoesophageal echocardiography was performed after LAA ligation in 103/138 patients (74.6%) after a mean of 181 ± 72 days. Complete LAA closure was documented in 100 patients (97.1%). Two patients (1.8% of patients with follow-up) experienced a transient ischaemic attack at 4 and 7 months follow-up, although there was no leak observed with TOE. There were two deaths during long-term follow-up which were both not device related. Conclusion: Initial experience with the LARIAT+ device demonstrates feasibility of LAA exclusion. Further larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85086052311&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/europace/euaa004
DO - 10.1093/europace/euaa004
M3 - Journal articles
C2 - 32044994
AN - SCOPUS:85086052311
SN - 1099-5129
VL - 22
SP - 924
EP - 931
JO - Europace
JF - Europace
IS - 6
ER -