3D-printed standardized phantoms for small animal PET and MRI: a comparison study

Fenja Zell; Julia Mannheim; Melanie Grehn; Magdalena Rafecas

doi:10.18416/AMMM.2019.1909S03P07

3D-printed standardized phantoms for small animal PET and MRI: a comparison study

Fenja Zell, Julia Mannheim, Melanie Grehn, Magdalena Rafecas

Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms are a cost-effective way for quality control of imaging devices. Here we evaluate two 3D printed versions of the NEMA NU 4-2008 phantom for small animal positron emission tomography (PET), compared to a phantom made of PMMA. The behavior of the materials is analyzed using PET for two radiotracers with different positron ranges, as well as the compatibility of the phantoms with MRI. In conclusion, image degradation due to positron range is more pronounced for the material E-Shell 600 clear. Some support materials required by 3D printing can produce artifacts in MRI images.

Originalsprache	Englisch
Zeitschrift	Transactions on Additive Manufacturing Meets Medicine
Jahrgang	1
Seitenumfang	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18416/AMMM.2019.1909S03P07
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 12.09.2019

UN SDGs

Dieser Output leistet einen Beitrag zu folgendem(n) Ziel(en) für nachhaltige Entwicklung

SDG 3 – Gesundheit und Wohlergehen
SDG 9 – Industrie, Innovation und Infrastruktur

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

Forschungsschwerpunkt: Biomedizintechnik

DFG-Fachsystematik

2.22-32 Medizinische Physik, Biomedizinische Technik

Dokumente

10.18416/AMMM.2019.1909S03P07

Zitieren

@article{f9aeef2f639346028b9b56ca88db9ca3,

title = "3D-printed standardized phantoms for small animal PET and MRI: a comparison study",

abstract = "Three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms are a cost-effective way for quality control of imaging devices. Here we evaluate two 3D printed versions of the NEMA NU 4-2008 phantom for small animal positron emission tomography (PET), compared to a phantom made of PMMA. The behavior of the materials is analyzed using PET for two radiotracers with different positron ranges, as well as the compatibility of the phantoms with MRI. In conclusion, image degradation due to positron range is more pronounced for the material E-Shell 600 clear. Some support materials required by 3D printing can produce artifacts in MRI images. ",

author = "Fenja Zell and Julia Mannheim and Melanie Grehn and Magdalena Rafecas",

year = "2019",

month = sep,

day = "12",

doi = "10.18416/AMMM.2019.1909S03P07",

language = "English",

volume = "1",

journal = "Transactions on Additive Manufacturing Meets Medicine",

publisher = "Infinite Science Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 3D-printed standardized phantoms for small animal PET and MRI: a comparison study

AU - Zell, Fenja

AU - Mannheim, Julia

AU - Grehn, Melanie

AU - Rafecas, Magdalena

PY - 2019/9/12

Y1 - 2019/9/12

N2 - Three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms are a cost-effective way for quality control of imaging devices. Here we evaluate two 3D printed versions of the NEMA NU 4-2008 phantom for small animal positron emission tomography (PET), compared to a phantom made of PMMA. The behavior of the materials is analyzed using PET for two radiotracers with different positron ranges, as well as the compatibility of the phantoms with MRI. In conclusion, image degradation due to positron range is more pronounced for the material E-Shell 600 clear. Some support materials required by 3D printing can produce artifacts in MRI images.

AB - Three-dimensional (3D) printed phantoms are a cost-effective way for quality control of imaging devices. Here we evaluate two 3D printed versions of the NEMA NU 4-2008 phantom for small animal positron emission tomography (PET), compared to a phantom made of PMMA. The behavior of the materials is analyzed using PET for two radiotracers with different positron ranges, as well as the compatibility of the phantoms with MRI. In conclusion, image degradation due to positron range is more pronounced for the material E-Shell 600 clear. Some support materials required by 3D printing can produce artifacts in MRI images.

U2 - 10.18416/AMMM.2019.1909S03P07

DO - 10.18416/AMMM.2019.1909S03P07

M3 - Journal articles

VL - 1

JO - Transactions on Additive Manufacturing Meets Medicine

JF - Transactions on Additive Manufacturing Meets Medicine

ER -

3D-printed standardized phantoms for small animal PET and MRI: a comparison study

Abstract

UN SDGs

Strategische Forschungsbereiche und Zentren

DFG-Fachsystematik

Dokumente

Fingerprint

Zitieren